Experimental evaluation demonstrates accurate detection of performance anomaly root causes across synthetic and real-world event logs, suggesting viable automated process intervention.
Process execution time is a key performance indicator for evaluating bottlenecks in business processes. Cases and activities that exceed the specified time constraints can be seen as anomalies, affecting process performance and leading to risks such as delays and customer complaints. Identifying the root causes of these anomalies can help formulate effective intervention measures. However, this task is inherently complex, and conducting incomplete or inaccurate analysis can result in misguided interventions that inadvertently exacerbate process inefficiencies. To address these challenges, this paper proposes a traceability-based root cause analysis approach for process performance anomalies using causal inference. Specifically, the approach begins by extracting hidden contextual information from the event log to enrich the pool of potential causal factors. Then formulates causal hypotheses linking these factors to observed performance anomalies (at both the case and activity level) and establishes potential causal relations through a traceability mechanism. A meta-learning based causal inference approach is used to estimate the strength of causal effects. The proposed approach is evaluated against a state-of-the-art approach using four synthetic event logs with known root causes and nine public real-life event logs. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed approach delivers accurate insights into the root causes of process performance anomalies in synthetic event logs, while maintaining high efficiency in the comprehensive analysis of potential causal factors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: