The Topic Detection and Tracking (TDT) evaluation program has included a "cluster detection" task since its inception in 1996. Systems were required to process a stream of broadcast news stories and partition them into non-overlapping clusters. A system's effectiveness was measured by comparing the generated clusters to "truth" clusters created by human annotators. Starting in 2003, TDT is moving to a more realistic model that permits overlapping clusters (stories may be on more than one topic) and encourages the creation of a hierarchy to structure the relationships between clusters (topics). We explore a range of possible evaluation models for this modified TDT clustering task to understand the best approach for mapping between the human-generated "truth" clusters and a much richer hierarchical structure. We demonstrate that some obvious evaluation techniques fail for degenerate cases. For a few others we attempt to develop an intuitive sense of what the evaluation numbers mean. We settle on some approaches that incorporate a strong balance between cluster errors (misses and false alarms) and the distance it takes to travel between stories within the hierarchy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Allan et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: