Key result
Older multimorbid patients experience 30-day unplanned readmissions as necessary actions to safeguard recovery and survival.
Why the study?
The study aimed to create a holistic understanding of the psychosocial processes experienced by older persons with multiple chronic conditions facing unplanned readmission within 30 days of discharge home, and to identify influencing factors.
Systematic Review (n=10)
Older persons with multiple chronic conditions experience unplanned readmission as a means to safeguard survival when feeling unsafe due to unmanageable symptoms and lack of support.
Enhancing community support may avert readmissions perceived as survival necessities; extends qualitative synthesis on multimorbidity experiences.
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to create a holistic understanding of the psychosocial processes of older persons with multiple chronic conditions' experience with unplanned readmission experiences within 30 days of discharge home and identify factors influencing these psychosocial processes. DESIGN: Mixed methods systematic review. DATA SOURCES: Six electronic databases (Ovid MEDLINE (R) All 1946-present, Scopus, CINAHL, Embase, PsychINFO and Web of Science). REVIEW METHODS: Peer-reviewed articles published between 2010 and 2021 and addressed study aims (n = 6116) were screened. Studies were categorised by method: qualitative and quantitative. Qualitative data synthesis used a meta-synthesis approach and applied thematic analysis. Quantitative data synthesis used vote counting. Data (qualitative and quantitative) were integrated through aggregation and configuration. RESULTS: Ten articles (n = 5 qualitative; n = 5 quantitative) were included. 'Safeguarding survival' described older persons' unplanned readmission experience. Older persons experienced three psychosocial processes: identifying missing pieces of care, reaching for lifelines and feeling unsafe. Factors influencing these psychosocial processes included chronic conditions and discharge diagnosis, increased assistance with functional needs, lack of discharge planning, lack of support, increased intensity of symptoms and previous hospital readmission experiences. CONCLUSIONS: Older persons felt more unsafe as their symptoms increased in intensity and unmanageability. Unplanned readmission was an action older persons required to safeguard their recovery and survival. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Nurses play a critical role in assessing and addressing factors that influence older persons' unplanned readmission. Identifying older persons' knowledge about chronic conditions, discharge planning, support (caregivers and community services), changes in functional needs, intensity of symptoms and past readmission experiences may prepare older persons to cope with their return home. Focusing on their health-care needs across the continuum of care (community, home and hospital) will mitigate the risks for unplanned readmission within 30 days of discharge. REPORTING METHOD: PRISMA guidelines. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public contribution due to design.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Coatsworth‐Puspoky et al. (2023) conducted a systematic review in Multiple chronic conditions with unplanned readmission (n=10). In a review of 10 articles, unplanned readmission within 30 days was experienced by older persons with multiple chronic conditions as an action required to safeguard their recovery and survival.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: