We conducted a national survey about access to and use of videoconferencing in Norwegian mental health care. A questionnaire was mailed to 300 institutions, with 113 returned (38%). Attitudes towards videoconferencing were positive. 58 of the respondents had access to videoconferencing equipment. 51 institutions had used videoconferencing in the previous year. Geographical and climatic factors and travel-related strain were predictors of access. Videoconferencing was mostly used for meetings, supervision and lectures, and to a lesser degree was used clinically, with the patient present. 90% of the institutions had experienced videoconferencing as useful. Lack of videoconferencing equipment in collaborating institutions was an inhibiting factor for use. There is a gap between the potential of videoconferencing and its actual utilization in Norway's mental health sector.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hanssen et al. (2007) studied this question.