Key result
Neurovascular coupling interactions in stroke patients show a weak inverse correlation with NIHSS scores.
Why the study?
Existing methods to study neurovascular coupling have limited temporal resolution, rely on indirect neuronal activity measures, or are predominantly linear, whereas transfer entropy can detect both linear and nonlinear interactions.
Can complex linear and nonlinear neurovascular coupling interactions in stroke patients be detected using transfer entropy between EEG and CBFV?
Observational
Can complex linear and nonlinear neurovascular coupling interactions in stroke patients be detected using transfer entropy between EEG and CBFV?
p-value: p=<0.05
Transfer entropy can detect complex linear and nonlinear neurovascular coupling dynamics in stroke patients, which correlate weakly with stroke severity and infarct growth.
Transfer entropy detects neurovascular coupling in stroke; leaves open its prognostic value pending validation.
Objective. The study of neurovascular coupling (NVC), the relationship between neuronal activity and cerebral blood flow, is essential for understanding brain physiology in both healthy and pathological states. Current methods to study NVC include neuroimaging techniques with limited temporal resolution and indirect neuronal activity measures. Methods including electroencephalographic (EEG) data are predominantly linear and display limitations that nonlinear methods address. Transfer entropy (TE) explores linear and nonlinear relationships simultaneously. This study hypothesizes that complex NVC interactions in stroke patients, both linear and nonlinear, can be detected using TE. Approach. TE between simultaneously recorded EEG and cerebral blood flow velocity (CBFV) signals was computed and analyzed in three settings: ipsilateral (EEG and CBFV from same hemisphere) stroke and nonstroke, and contralateral (EEG from stroke hemisphere, CBFV from nonstroke hemisphere). A surrogate analysis was performed to evaluate the significance of TE values and to identify the nature of the interactions. Main results. The results showed that EEG generally influenced CBFV. There were more linear+nonlinear interactions in the ipsilateral nonstroke setting and in the delta band in ipsilateral stroke and contralateral settings. Interactions between EEG and CBFV were stronger on the nonstroke side for linear+nonlinear dynamics. The strength and nature of the interactions were weakly correlated with clinical outcomes (e.g. delta band ( p < 0.05): infarct growth linear = −0.448, linear+nonlinear = −0.339; NIHSS linear = −0.473, linear+nonlinear = −0.457). Significance. This study exemplifies the benefits of using TE in linear and nonlinear NVC analysis to better understand the implications of these dynamics in stroke severity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rozo et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Stroke. Transfer entropy analysis of EEG and cerebral blood flow velocity vs. Ipsilateral nonstroke and contralateral settings was evaluated on Neurovascular coupling interactions (linear and nonlinear) and correlation with clinical outcomes (p=<0.05). Transfer entropy analysis of EEG and cerebral blood flow velocity in stroke patients revealed that neurovascular coupling interactions weakly correlated with NIHSS scores (r=-0.457, p<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: