Comparative analysis highlights variations in poverty measurement outcomes and suggests multi-measure reporting.
A comparative analysis of different poverty measures, particularly across studies that use different conceptualizations and measurements of poverty, is very valuable. In highlighting this fact, this article compares three poverty measurements: monetary poverty, social exclusion, and capability poverty measurements. The results indicate that all three poverty measurements classify varied proportions of the U.S. population as poor. These variations occur as a function of the conceptualization and measurement of poverty. In general, all three poverty measurements are inadequate indicators of well-being. It is reasonable to suggest that researchers report results using more than one poverty measurement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moses Kwadzo (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: