Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: Existing burn resuscitation protocols exhibit a large variability in treatment efficacy. Hence, they must be further optimized based on comprehensive knowledge of burn pathophysiology. A physics-based mathematical model that can replicate physiological responses in diverse burn patients can serve as an attractive basis to perform non-clinical testing of burn resuscitation protocols and to expand knowledge on burn pathophysiology. We intend to develop, optimize, validate, and analyze a mathematical model to replicate physiological responses in burn patients. METHODS: Using clinical datasets collected from 233 burn patients receiving burn resuscitation, we developed and validated a mathematical model applicable to computer-aided in-human burn resuscitation trial and knowledge expansion. Using the validated mathematical model, we examined possible physiological mechanisms responsible for the cohort-dependent differences in burn pathophysiology between younger versus older patients, female versus male patients, and patients with versus without inhalational injury. RESULTS: We demonstrated that the mathematical model can replicate physiological responses in burn patients associated with wide demographic characteristics and injury severity, and that an increased inflammatory response to injury may be a key contributing factor in increasing the mortality risk of older patients and patients with inhalation injury via an increase in the fluid retention. CONCLUSION: We developed and validated a physiologically plausible mathematical model of volume kinetic and kidney function after burn injury and resuscitation suited to in-human application. SIGNIFICANCE: The mathematical model may provide an attractive platform to conduct non-clinical testing of burn resuscitation protocols and test new hypotheses on burn pathophysiology.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arabidarrehdor et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: