Key result
Coronary sinus reducer improves stress myocardial blood flow ~32% in refractory angina from HCM.
Why the study?
Does coronary sinus reducer implantation improve myocardial perfusion and angina symptoms in a patient with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and coronary microvascular disease?
Case Report (n=1)
Does coronary sinus reducer implantation improve myocardial perfusion and angina symptoms in a patient with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and coronary microvascular disease?
Coronary sinus reducer implantation may improve myocardial perfusion, diastolic function, and angina symptoms in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and coronary microvascular disease.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports hypothesis of benefit in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy microvascular angina; leaves open confirmation in prospective trials.
A 69-year-old woman with incapacitating central chest pain despite 3 antianginal medications at maximum tolerated doses and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with no evidence of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction but extensive anterior subendocardial perfusion abnormality due to coronary microvascular disease was considered for a coronary sinus reducer to treat refractory angina. History of PresentationWe present the case of a 69-year-old woman with nonobstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) confirmed on genetic testing, echocardiography, and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging and a long history of atypical chest pains who then developed recurrent chest pain at rest radiating to her jaw, with breathlessness, nausea, and palpitations associated with small troponin rises.She was diagnosed with a noneST-segment elevation myocardial infarction complicated by nonsustained ventricular tachycardia.Coronary computed tomographic angiography documented unobstructed coronary arteries, and she was initially treated medically.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hoole et al. (2024) conducted a case report in Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, refractory angina, and coronary microvascular disease (n=1). Coronary sinus reducer vs. Baseline was evaluated on Myocardial perfusion (global stress myocardial blood flow) and angina burden (SAQ-7 score).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: