Why the study?
Coronary physiology assessment in rodents by ultrasound is noninvasive and easy to perform, prompting investigation of pulsed-wave Doppler, myocardial contrast echocardiography, and their calculated parameters at rest and under pharmacologically induced stress.
Does pharmacological stress with adenosine and dobutamine alter coronary physiology parameters measured by pulsed-wave Doppler and myocardial contrast echocardiography in anaesthetised rats?
Does pharmacological stress with adenosine and dobutamine alter coronary physiology parameters measured by pulsed-wave Doppler and myocardial contrast echocardiography in anaesthetised rats?
Transthoracic pulsed-wave Doppler and myocardial contrast echocardiography can successfully monitor pharmacologically induced changes in coronary physiology in rats, providing a noninvasive method for longitudinal preclinical studies.
Enables noninvasive longitudinal coronary physiology monitoring in rat models; leaves open clinical translation.
Background Coronary physiology assessment in rodents by ultrasound is an excellent noninvasive and easy to perform technique, including pulsed-wave Doppler (PWD) and myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE). Both techniques and the corresponding calculated parameters were investigated in this study at rest as well as their response to pharmacologically induced stress. Methods Left ventricular myocardial function was assessed in eight anaesthetised rats using transthoracic echocardiography. Coronary physiology was assessed by both PWD of the left coronary artery and MCE using a bolus method. Measurements were performed at rest and under stimulation with adenosine and dobutamine. Effects of stimulation on the calculated parameters were evaluated and rated by effect size ( η 2 ). Results Changes could be demonstrated by selected parameters of PWD and MCE. The clearest effect in PWD was found for diastolic peak velocity ( η 2 = 0.58). It increased from 528 ± 110 mm/s (mean ± standard deviation) at rest to 839 ± 342 mm/s ( p = 0.001) with adenosine and 1093 ± 302 mm/s with dobutamine ( p = 0.001). The most distinct effect from MCE was found for the normalised wash-in rate ( η 2 = 0.58). It increased from 1.95 ± 0.35% at rest to 3.87 ± 0.85% with adenosine ( p = 0.001) and 3.72 ± 1.03% with dobutamine ( p = 0.001). Conclusion Induced changes in coronary physiology by adenosine and dobutamine could successfully be monitored using MCE and PWD in anaesthetised rats. Due to the low invasiveness of the measurements, this protocol could be used for longitudinal animal studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Billig et al. (2023) studied Healthy (sham laparotomy) (n=8). Adenosine and Dobutamine vs. Baseline (rest) was evaluated on Diastolic peak velocity (DPV) during adenosine infusion (η2 0.58, p=0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: