Key result
Genomic screening-identified desmosome variants yield 0 observed VAs during follow-up despite predicted risk.
Why the study?
The ARVC risk calculator predicts risk in diagnosed ARVC, but predicted risk in the context of identification via population genomic screening has not been explored.
What is the predicted and observed risk of ventricular arrhythmias in a genome-first population with genetic risk for ARVC?
Cohort (n=113)
What is the predicted and observed risk of ventricular arrhythmias in a genome-first population with genetic risk for ARVC?
In a genome-first population with desmosome variants, the predicted 5-year risk of ventricular arrhythmias is low and no sustained VA events were observed over a median 3 years of follow-up.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Low predicted/observed VA risk in genome-first desmosome carriers cautions against overestimating penetrance; leaves open validation of ARVC models in unselected populations.
BACKGROUND: Population genomic screening for desmosome variants associated with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) may facilitate early disease detection and protective intervention. The validated ARVC risk calculator offers a novel means to risk stratify individuals with diagnosed ARVC, but predicted risk in the context of genomic screening identification has not been explored. METHODS: Individuals harboring a pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant in a desmosome gene ( PKP2 , DSP , DSG2 , or DSC2 ) were identified through the Geisinger MyCode Genomic Screening and Counseling program. The ARVC risk calculator was applied to patients with a subsequent evaluation of right ventricular function. This predicted risk was compared with outcomes in the first 5 years (range, 0.3–5.0 years) after genetic result return. RESULTS: Of 254 individuals with a clinically confirmed pathogenic/likely pathogenic desmosome variant, 113 (median age, 56 [interquartile range, 42–66]; 71% female) had cardiac imaging in follow-up and no prior sustained ventricular arrhythmia (VA). Eighty-two (73%) had no ARVC task force criteria (TFC) besides the variant (possible diagnosis), 22 (19%) had a single additional minor criterion (borderline diagnosis), and 9 (8%) met criteria for definite diagnosis. The median 5-year predicted VA risk was 3.9% (2.3%–6.6%), notably lower than that of the calculator derivation cohort (20.6%). The risk of fast VA was 1.6% (1.0%–2.9%). The predicted VA risk was higher in individuals with any nongenetic ARVC task force criteria (6.3% [2.5–13.2%]) versus those without (3.7% [2.2–5.6%]; P =0.01), and in individuals with DSP variants (6.1% [3.9–7.8%] versus PKP2 3.4% [2.2–5.3%]; P =0.01). Over a median 3.0 years of follow-up (≤5 years only), no sustained VA events were observed in this cohort. CONCLUSIONS: The predicted 5-year risk of VA in individuals ascertained via population genomic screening for desmosome variants is low (3.9%; 1.6% for fast VA) but may vary by affected gene and ARVC task force criteria burden.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Carruth et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) genetic risk (n=113). ARVC risk calculator was evaluated on Sustained ventricular arrhythmia (VA). In individuals with genomic screening-identified desmosome variants, the predicted 5-year risk of ventricular arrhythmias was 3.9%, with 0 observed events over a median 3.0 years of follow-up.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: