Key result
High-resolution variant interpretation in 296 sudden unexplained deaths identified pathogenic variants with yields varying by ethnicity, from 21.4% in mixed ethnicities to 2.0% in Blacks.
Cohort (n=296)
No
High-resolution genetic variant interpretation in sudden unexplained death reveals significant disparities in diagnostic yield and variants of uncertain significance across different ethnicities, highlighting the need for greater inclusion of under-represented populations in genomic studies.
Ethnic disparities in SUD genetic yield urge ethnicity-aware variant interpretation; leaves open broader inclusion of underrepresented ancestries in reference databases.
BACKGROUND: Genetic variant interpretation contributes to testing yield differences reported for sudden unexplained death. Adapting a high-resolution variant interpretation framework, which considers disease prevalence, reduced penetrance, genetic heterogeneity, and allelic contribution to determine the maximum tolerated allele count in gnomAD, we report an evaluation of cardiac channelopathy and cardiomyopathy genes in a large, demographically diverse sudden unexplained death cohort that underwent thorough investigation in the United States' largest medical examiner's office. METHODS AND RESULTS: The cohort has 296 decedents: 147 Blacks, 64 Hispanics, 49 Whites, 22 Asians, and 14 mixed ethnicities; 142 infants (1 to 11 months), 39 children (1 to 17 years), 74 young adults (18 to 34 years), and 41 adults (35 to 55 years). Eighty-nine cardiac disease genes were evaluated. Using a high-resolution variant interpretation workflow, we classified 17 variants as pathogenic or likely pathogenic (2 of which were incidental findings and excluded in testing yield analysis), 46 novel variants of uncertain significance, and 130 variants of uncertain significance. Nine pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in ClinVar were reclassified to likely benign and excluded in testing yield analysis. The yields of positive cases by ethnicity and age were 21.4% in mixed ethnicities, 10.2% Whites, 4.5% Asians, 3.1% Hispanics, and 2% Blacks; 7.7% children, 7.3% in adults, 5.4% young adults, and 2.8% infants. The percentages of uncertain cases with variants of uncertain significance by ethnicity were 45.5% in Asians, 45.3% Hispanics, 44.20% Blacks, 36.7% Whites, and 14.3% in mixed ethnicities. CONCLUSIONS: High-resolution variant interpretation provides diagnostic accuracy and healthcare efficiency. Under-represented populations warrant greater inclusion in future studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lin et al. (2017) conducted a cohort in Sudden unexplained death (n=296). High-resolution variant interpretation framework was evaluated on Testing yield of positive cases and variants of uncertain significance. High-resolution variant interpretation in 296 sudden unexplained deaths identified pathogenic variants with yields varying by ethnicity, from 21.4% in mixed ethnicities to 2.0% in Blacks.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: