Key result
Cryoballoon ablation resulted in a greater improvement in left atrial ejection fraction at 1 month compared to radiofrequency ablation (4.0% vs -0.8%; P<0.001).
Why the study?
Pulmonary vein isolation creates scar tissue in the left atrium, which may affect left atrial function.
Does cryoballoon ablation improve left atrial ejection fraction at 1 month compared to radiofrequency ablation in patients with nonvalvular paroxysmal atrial fibrillation?
RCT (n=120)
1:2 allocation
Does cryoballoon ablation improve left atrial ejection fraction at 1 month compared to radiofrequency ablation in patients with nonvalvular paroxysmal atrial fibrillation?
Absolute Event Rate: 4% vs -0.8%
p-value: p=< 0.001
Cryoballoon ablation for pulmonary vein isolation in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation is associated with better preservation or improvement of left atrial ejection fraction at 1 and 3 months compared to radiofrequency ablation.
Cryoballoon ablation may better preserve early left atrial function after PVI in paroxysmal AF; extends RCT comparisons of ablation modalities on remodeling.
BACKGROUND: Isolation of the pulmonary veins (PVI) has become a mainstay in atrial fibrillation (AFib) therapy. Lesions in left atrial tissue lead to scar formation and this may affect left atrial function. METHODS: Patients with paroxysmal AFib were randomly assigned in a 1:2 allocation scheme to radiofrequency (RF) ablation or cryoballoon. Real-time three-dimensional echocardiography was performed (under sinus rhythm in all cases) before ablation and at 1 and 3 months to evaluate the left atrial functional indices. The primary outcome measure was change in left atrial ejection fraction (LAEF) at 1 month. RESULTS: 120 patients were randomized (80 to cryoballoon, 40 to RF). The absolute change in LAEF at 1 month was 4.0 (Q1-Q3, -0.1to 7.6)% in the cryoballoon group and -0.8 (Q1-Q3, -1.9 to 0.9)% in the RF group (P < 0.001 for the comparison between groups). At 3 months, the corresponding changes were 6.7 (Q1-Q3, 3.4-11.2)% and 0.7 (Q1-Q3, -0.7 to 3.5)%, respectively (P < 0.001). Overall, the rate of patients with lower LAEF at 3 months compared to baseline was 2.5% in the cryoballoon group and 32.5% in the RF group (P < 0.001). AFib recurrence rate at 6 months was higher in patients with decreased LAEF (odds ratio, 6.2; 95% confidence interval, 2.0-19.5; P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: The Cryo-LAEF study prospectively compared the effects of RF and cryoballoon ablation on left atrial function. Both at 1 and 3 months postablation, LAEF was either improved or stable in both ablation groups.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Γιαννόπουλος et al. (2019) conducted an RCT in nonvalvular paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (n=120). Cryoballoon ablation vs. Radiofrequency (RF) ablation was evaluated on change in left atrial ejection fraction (LAEF) at 1 month (p=< 0.001). Cryoballoon ablation resulted in a greater improvement in left atrial ejection fraction at 1 month compared to radiofrequency ablation (4.0% vs -0.8%; P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: