Key result
Coronary sinus activation time ≤39 ms distinguished roof-dependent atrial flutter from mitral annular flutter with 100% sensitivity and 97% specificity.
Why the study?
How do ECG and coronary sinus activation characteristics differ between roof-dependent left atrial flutter and mitral annular flutter in patients post-pulmonary vein isolation?
Population
33 patients post-pulmonary vein isolation with roof-dependent atrial flutter based on activation and…
Comparison
ECG and coronary sinus activation mapping vs Mitral annular (MA) flutter
Design
Cross-sectional
Authors
Loading...
May support CS activation ≤39 ms to differentiate roof-dependent from mitral annular flutter; hypothesis-generating pending prospective validation.
Observational (n=33)
How do ECG and coronary sinus activation characteristics differ between roof-dependent left atrial flutter and mitral annular flutter in patients post-pulmonary vein isolation?
Roof-dependent left atrial flutter can be distinguished from mitral annular flutter by a more simultaneous coronary sinus activation time (≤39 ms).
Casado-Arroyo et al. (2018) conducted an observational in Roof-dependent left atrial flutter post-pulmonary vein isolation (n=33). Coronary sinus activation and ECG mapping vs. Mitral annular flutter was evaluated on Coronary sinus activation time ≤39 ms to identify roof versus MA flutter. Coronary sinus activation time ≤39 ms distinguished roof-dependent atrial flutter from mitral annular flutter with 100% sensitivity and 97% specificity.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: