Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Conventionally, the definition of translational research describes a two-way process of translation from the "bench" to the "bedside" and the "bedside" to the "bench." In this article, however, I suggest that those at the bottom (i.e., the clinicians) are likely to pay more attention to what those at the top (i.e., the scientists) say than vice versa. I argue that the experience of the patient, omitted from consideration, has much to add to the understanding of both clinicians and scientists. In this address I recommend using qualitative research to give voice to the experience of patients. I use examples from my own research with older widows to demonstrate its usefulness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Deborah K. van den Hoonaard (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: