PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 1, 1996Journal of Research on Computing in Education169 citations

The Equivalence of Paper-and-Pencil and Computer-Based Testing

View Full Paper
ABAlan C. Bugbee

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

In recent years, there has been increased interest in converting from paper-and-pencil to computer-based tests. As more and more organizations consider converting from paper-and-pencil tests to computer-administered ones, the importance of such research increases dramatically. This article examines the research showing the equivalence of paper-and-pencil–administered tests and computer-administered tests, especially when the computer-administered test is exactly the same as the paper-and-pencil test. Four different categories of research on testing by computer are examined: previous reviews of research, standards and guidelines for computerized testing, individual research studies, and studies about computerized testing over time. From this review, a number of general conclusions about testing by computer are reached: (a) it can be equivalent to a paper-and-pencil test, but it is the responsibility of the test developer to prove that it is; (b) this equivalence is established by meeting stringent criteria; (c) computers affect testing; (d) special considerations are necessary when computers are used for tests; and (e) test users must have at least a basic understanding of the computer and its vicissitudes, in conjunction with a knowledge of the psychometric properties of the test, to effectively use computer testing.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Alan C. Bugbee (1996) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a190119899f154814be2942https://doi.org/10.1080/08886504.1996.10782166
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1TIME’S UP! The Effects of Time Constraints and Mode of Administration on Test Performance and Perception1992 · 2 citations
  2. 2Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research1963 · 15,249 citations
  3. 3Standards for educational and psychological testing1985 · 1,491 citations
  4. 4Comparison and Equating of Paper-Administered, Computer-Administered and Computerized Adaptive Tests of Achievement.1986 · 41 citations
  5. 5The educational researcher2021 · 3,089 citations