This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
In recent years, there has been increased interest in converting from paper-and-pencil to computer-based tests. As more and more organizations consider converting from paper-and-pencil tests to computer-administered ones, the importance of such research increases dramatically. This article examines the research showing the equivalence of paper-and-pencil–administered tests and computer-administered tests, especially when the computer-administered test is exactly the same as the paper-and-pencil test. Four different categories of research on testing by computer are examined: previous reviews of research, standards and guidelines for computerized testing, individual research studies, and studies about computerized testing over time. From this review, a number of general conclusions about testing by computer are reached: (a) it can be equivalent to a paper-and-pencil test, but it is the responsibility of the test developer to prove that it is; (b) this equivalence is established by meeting stringent criteria; (c) computers affect testing; (d) special considerations are necessary when computers are used for tests; and (e) test users must have at least a basic understanding of the computer and its vicissitudes, in conjunction with a knowledge of the psychometric properties of the test, to effectively use computer testing.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alan C. Bugbee (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: