Key result
Percutaneous in situ coronary venous arterialization was attempted in 11 highly symptomatic no-option patients, resulting in 2 deaths and 6 failures to create the bypass.
Why the study?
Is percutaneous in situ coronary venous arterialization feasible and safe in highly symptomatic "no-option" patients with diffuse coronary artery disease?
Observational (n=11)
Is percutaneous in situ coronary venous arterialization feasible and safe in highly symptomatic "no-option" patients with diffuse coronary artery disease?
Early human experience with percutaneous in situ coronary venous arterialization showed feasibility in no-option patients but was limited by a high rate of procedural failure and mortality.
High failure and mortality rates caution against adoption; leaves open feasibility after technical refinement in prospective studies.
Diffuse coronary artery disease is frequently untreatable by coronary artery bypass or angioplasty. Open chest surgical arterialization of the coronary venous system was successfully performed before the widespread use of coronary artery bypass grafting and has been applied in ungraftable patients thereafter. Percutaneous in situ coronary venous arterialization (PICVA) follows this surgical experience, using a series of unique catheter-based devices to arterialize isolated segments of coronary vein, forcing retroperfusion of severely ischemic myocardium. In a series of animals, this procedure had been shown to reduce ischemia and myocardial damage in an infarction model. In the PICVA European Safety trial, the first 11 percutaneous applications of catheter-based coronary bypass in humans revealed feasibility of the technique in highly symptomatic "no-option" patients. Despite two deaths and six failures to create the bypass, we continue to believe that on further development, the catheter-based coronary bypass can become a broad-based interventional application.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nicolaus Reifart (2005) conducted an observational in Diffuse coronary artery disease (n=11). Percutaneous in situ coronary venous arterialization (PICVA) was evaluated on Feasibility and safety. Percutaneous in situ coronary venous arterialization was attempted in 11 highly symptomatic no-option patients, resulting in 2 deaths and 6 failures to create the bypass.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: