Key result
Pre-hospital thrombolysis significantly increased the proportion of patients achieving a call-to-needle time within 60 minutes compared to in-hospital thrombolysis (79% vs 24%, p<0.001).
Why the study?
Does pre-hospital thrombolysis reduce call-to-needle times in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Observational (n=535)
Does pre-hospital thrombolysis reduce call-to-needle times in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Pre-hospital thrombolysis significantly reduces call-to-needle times, enabling more patients to meet the 60-minute treatment guideline for acute myocardial infarction.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Pre-hospital thrombolysis may increase guideline-adherent call-to-needle times in AMI; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation.
BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend that patients with acute myocardial infarction should receive thrombolysis within 60 min of seeking professional help. AIM: To compare current rates of pre-hospital thrombolysis in Grampian with historical data, and assess the effect of pre-hospital thrombolysis on the proportion of patients achieving 'call-to-needle' times within national guidelines. DESIGN: Prospective audit. METHODS: Data were collected on all patients (n=535) admitted to the coronary care unit and thrombolysed, either in hospital or in the community from July 2000 to June 2002, using standardized forms. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-three patients (25%) received pre-hospital thrombolysis and 402 (75%) received in-hospital thrombolysis. This compares with a 19% (195/1046) pre-hospital thrombolysis rate in the mid-1990s (p=0.005). Median 'call-to-needle' times were 45 min for pre-hospital thrombolysis and 105 min for patients who received in-hospital thrombolysis (p < 0.001). Only 24% (96/396) of patients receiving in-hospital thrombolysis were treated within the recommended guideline, vs. 79% (88/111) of pre-hospital thrombolysis patients (p <0.001). DISCUSSION: Pre-hospital thrombolysis rates in Grampian are increasing. Administration of thrombolysis in the community greatly increases the proportion of patients achieving a 'call-to-needle' time of 60 min, with a median time saving of approximately 1 h.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Smith et al. (2004) conducted an observational in Acute myocardial infarction (n=535). Pre-hospital thrombolysis vs. In-hospital thrombolysis was evaluated on Proportion of patients achieving 'call-to-needle' times within national guidelines (≤60 min) (p=<0.001). Pre-hospital thrombolysis significantly increased the proportion of patients achieving a call-to-needle time within 60 minutes compared to in-hospital thrombolysis (79% vs 24%, p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: