Key result
Breast cancer treatments induce cardiovascular toxicities that require prompt monitoring and multidisciplinary cardio-oncology management.
Why the study?
Improved breast cancer therapies have increased survival, but patients can experience long-term cardiovascular toxicities from recently approved treatments.
What are the cardiovascular toxicities associated with various antineoplastic agents in patients with breast cancer?
What are the cardiovascular toxicities associated with various antineoplastic agents in patients with breast cancer?
This review highlights the diverse cardiovascular toxicities associated with modern breast cancer therapies, emphasizing the need for cardio-oncology monitoring and management.
Supports cardio-oncology integration in breast cancer; leaves open optimal monitoring protocols for prospective validation.
Cancer and cardiovascular diseases are the two major causes of mortality, morbidity, and disability worldwide. The improvement in effective therapeutic options for the management of breast cancer (BC) has led to an increased number of BC survivors, who can experience long-term toxicities from cancer treatments. Adverse events including cardiovascular toxicities must be considered in light of effectiveness of recently approved drugs for BC treatment, including elacestrant, tucatinib, neratinib, olaparib, the immune checkpoint inhibitors, trastuzumab deruxtecan, or sacituzumab govitecan. Many cancer drugs affect the cardiovascular system with a range of clinical manifestations. Prompt diagnosis and treatment as well as a multidisciplinary approach involving a cardio-oncologist is optimal for management of these cardiovascular events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zagami et al. (2023) conducted a review in Breast Cancer. Breast cancer treatments was evaluated. Various breast cancer treatments can induce cardiovascular toxicities, necessitating prompt diagnosis, monitoring, and a multidisciplinary approach involving cardio-oncologists for optimal management.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: