Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Previous work on amenity-driven migration documented substantial differences between permanent and seasonal residents and the effects of these differences on community social dimensions. This study focuses on seasonal and permanent residents’ attachments to their local area. To increase our understanding of those factors associated with community attachment in amenity-rich areas, we incorporate attitudinal and behavioral measures associated with the biophysical environment in our model. We find natural landscape-based factors make an independent and important contribution to community attachment for both permanent and seasonal residents.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Matarrita‐Cascante et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: