Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Most person-fit statistics require long tests to reliably detect aberrant item-score vectors and are not readily applicable to noncognitive measures that consist of multiple short subscales. The authors propose combining subscale person-fit information to detect aberrant item-score vectors on noncognitive multiscale measures. They used a simulation study and three empirical personality and psychopathology test datasets to assess five multiscale person-fit methods based on the [Formula: see text] person-fit statistic with respect to (a) identifying aberrant item-score vectors, (b) improving accuracy of research results, and (c) understanding causes of aberrant responding. Simulated data analysis showed that the person-fit methods had good detection rates for substantially misfitting item-score vectors. Real-data person-fit analyses identified 4% to 17% misfitting item-score vectors. Removal of these vectors little improved model fit and test-score validity. The person-fit methods helped to understand causes of aberrant responding after controlling for response style on the explanatory variables. More real-data analyses are needed to demonstrate the usefulness of multiscale person-fit methods for noncognitive multiscale measures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Conijn et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: