Key result
Pharmacist-initiated electronic discharge prescribing reduced the median time from discharge decision to completed prescription reaching the patient from 190 to 50 minutes.
Why the study?
Does pharmacist-initiated electronic discharge prescribing decrease discharge times and improve prescribing accuracy in cardiology patients?
Observational (n=74)
Does pharmacist-initiated electronic discharge prescribing decrease discharge times and improve prescribing accuracy in cardiology patients?
Pharmacist-initiated electronic discharge prescribing significantly reduces the time required for the discharge medication pathway and decreases prescribing errors of omission.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May accelerate cardiology discharge workflows; leaves open effects on accuracy and outcomes in randomized trials.
Aim To determine whether pharmacist‐initiated electronic discharge prescribing would decrease discharge times for selected cardiology patients and improve the accuracy of prescribing by limiting deviations from the intended therapeutic plan. Method A cardiology project team identified system issues impeding patient flow through the ward, including the discharge medication pathway. The stages of the medication pathway were mapped before and after the intervention of pharmacist‐initiated electronic discharge prescribing. The accuracy of prescribing in both phases of the study was measured against evidence‐based standards agreed by the cardiology unit. Results 39 patients were recruited in phase 1 (usual practice) and 35 patients in phase 2 (pharmacist‐initiated discharge prescriptions). The time from a decision to discharge a patient to the completed prescription reaching the patient was significantly reduced from a median of 190 minutes to 50 minutes in the intervention arm (p < 0.0001). However, this result did not translate into patients leaving the hospital earlier. In phase 1, 26% of prescriptions (n = 39) contained at least one error, including 19 clinically significant omissions. In phase 2, no omissions were made but the signing doctor made two changes to the pharmacist‐initiated prescriptions that were unrelated to the evidence‐based standards. Conclusion This pilot study has shown that an experienced pharmacy specialist using an electronic discharge prescribing system can significantly reduce the time elements of the discharge medication pathway. In addition, errors of omission that deviate from evidence‐based practice are reduced. This practice model can be extended to other specialist areas.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Birdsey et al. (2005) conducted an observational in Cardiology patients (n=74). Pharmacist-initiated electronic discharge prescribing vs. Usual practice was evaluated on Time from a decision to discharge a patient to the completed prescription reaching the patient (p=<0.0001). Pharmacist-initiated electronic discharge prescribing reduced the median time from discharge decision to completed prescription reaching the patient from 190 to 50 minutes.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: