Shows ctDNA testing predicts outcomes in lymphoma, suggesting its role in treatment monitoring.
Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a novel biomarker to assess tumor burden, molecular residual disease (MRD), and treatment response in patients with cancer, including hematologic malignancies. This study reports the largest real-world cohort to date evaluating ctDNA testing, ctDNA-MRD detection, and ctDNA clearance dynamics in newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory lymphoma. We analyzed plasma from 144 patients with stage I-IV primary lymphoma (aggressive B-cell, n=110; aggressive T-cell, n=13; indolent B-cell, n=15; indolent T-cell, n=6; median of seven samples per patient). ctDNA was evaluated using a personalized, tumor-informed, multiplex PCR assay (Signatera TM ). Pretreatment ctDNA was detectable in 94.3% of evaluable patients. End-of-treatment (EOT) ctDNA-MRD positivity was prognostic of inferior event-free survival (EFS) (adjusted HR, 22.43; 95% CI, 6.76–74.45; p<0.0001). In multivariate analysis, EOT ctDNA-MRD positivity was the most powerful independent predictor of EFS (HR, 37.10; 95% CI, 6.20–221.8; p<0.001), exceeding the prognostic value of EOT PET/CT positivity (HR, 5.88; 95% CI, 1.35–25.6). Early ctDNA clearance during first-line therapy was associated with significantly improved EFS (adjusted HR, 8.57; 95% CI, 2.55–28.81; p=0.005). In the relapsed setting following CAR-T therapy, ctDNA-MRD negativity predicted prolonged event-free intervals. ctDNA-MRD positivity during post-therapy surveillance was associated with significantly inferior EFS (adjusted HR: 33.74, 95%CI: 9.34-121.82, p<0.0001). These data establish ctDNA as a robust biomarker for prognosis, treatment monitoring, and early relapse detection across B- and T-cell lymphoma subtypes, with superior prognostic value over conventional imaging, supporting its integration into response assessment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Galanina et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: