Cross-sectional study examines factors influencing electric-powered mobility device prescriptions in a metropolitan area, suggesting a focus on autonomy.
PURPOSE: This observational study examined how demographic, clinical and territorial factors influence prescriptions of electric-powered mobility devices in a metropolitan area of Southern Italy, aiming to clarify which characteristics drive the choice between indoor, outdoor, and mixed-use aids. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2024 to July 2025, 572 users were classified according to underlying disorders and type of mobility aids: indoor, outdoor, and mixed-use. RESULTS: = 0.0002), indicating variability in territorial service organisation or environmental demands. CONCLUSIONS: Prescription patterns reflect the interplay between clinical profiles, rehabilitation settings, and territorial characteristics. Data-driven and flexible models that prioritise autonomy-rather than functional restoration alone-may enhance participation, independence, and equitable access to powered mobility technologies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chiaramonte et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: