Randomized trial assesses fit and thickness of 3D-printed and thermoformed aligners, indicating differences in design methods.
Objective: To assess the adaptation and thickness of three-dimensional (3D)-printed and thermoformed aligners, comparing differences in relation to fabrication methods, inner-surface offset, and tooth region. Methods: tests. Results: < 0.001). Conclusions: A 0.05-mm offset in 3D-printed aligners produced gap values comparable to those obtained with thermoformed aligners and showed consistent adaptation over tooth regions. 3D-printed aligners tended to show greater thickness than their virtual design, whereas thermoformed aligners showed reduced thickness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: