Key result
Concomitant COPD in patients undergoing percutaneous mitral valve repair was associated with similar in-hospital mortality compared to non-COPD patients (2.6% vs 2.9%; p=0.6).
Why the study?
Data were lacking on the outcomes of percutaneous mitral valve repair for mitral regurgitation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Does concomitant COPD affect in-hospital mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing percutaneous mitral valve repair?
Observational (n=9,125)
Yes
Does concomitant COPD affect in-hospital mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing percutaneous mitral valve repair?
Absolute Event Rate: 2.6% vs 2.9%
p-value: p=0.6
While COPD does not increase in-hospital mortality after percutaneous mitral valve repair, it is associated with significantly higher rates of in-hospital morbidities and resource utilization.
OBJECTIVES: We aimed to assess the in-hospital outcomes in patients with mitral regurgitation treated with percutaneous mitral valve repair (PMVR) among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). BACKGROUND: There is lack of data on the outcomes of PMVR for mitral regurgitation in patients with COPD. METHODS: We analyzed the national inpatient sample (NIS) database from January 2012 to December 2016. RESULTS: A total of 9125 patients underwent PMVR in the period between January 2012 and December 2016, of whom 2,495 (27.3%) patients had concomitant COPD. Comparing COPD patients to non-COPD patients, COPD patients had higher proportion of females (48.3% vs. 46.6%, p = .16), were younger (75.8 ± 10.0 years vs. 76.4 ± 12.2 years; p = .04), had higher prevalence of peripheral vascular disease (17.4% vs. 13.5%; p < .01) and renal failure (39.3% vs. 37%; p < .01). After propensity matching, there was no significant difference in mortality among the COPD group versus non-COPD patients (2.6% vs. 2.9%; p = .6). Patients with COPD had higher proportion of in-hospital morbidities including St-segment elevation myocardial infarction (1.8% vs. 1.0%; p = .02), cardiogenic shock (1.4% vs. 0.4%; p < .01), vascular complications (2% vs. 0.8; p < .01), pneumothorax (1% vs. 0.4%; p < .01), and septic shock (1.2% vs. 0.4%; p < .01). Moreover, surrogates of severe disability (mechanical intubation and non-home discharges), cost of hospitalization, and length of stay were higher in the COPD group. CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in mortality between the COPD and non-COPD patients after PMVR. Moreover, we observed higher rates of in-hospital morbidities, surrogates of severe disability, and higher resources utilization by the COPD group.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Osman et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Mitral regurgitation with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (n=9,125). Percutaneous mitral valve repair in patients with COPD vs. Percutaneous mitral valve repair in patients without COPD was evaluated on In-hospital mortality (p=0.6). Concomitant COPD in patients undergoing percutaneous mitral valve repair was associated with similar in-hospital mortality compared to non-COPD patients (2.6% vs 2.9%; p=0.6).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: