Reveals how agricultural planning shapes dissent through governance techniques in Richmond, suggesting implications for policy-making.
• Farmland conflicts in Richmond, BC reveal how municipal planning shapes dissent through consensus governance and technical planning tools. • Using radical-agonistic planning theory, the study shows how competing visions of agriculture are selectively integrated to shape legitimacy. • Agricultural planning institutionalizes, translating political contestation into consultation and manageable outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dring et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: