Analyzes Kongish on Kongish Daily, demonstrating how it fosters identity by excluding outsiders.
Kongish, the practice of mixing romanized Cantonese and English (including standard and non-standard forms) on Kongish Daily , an online platform, has attracted much academic interest, with existing studies adopting a translanguaging lens to examine the creativity, ludicity, and criticality of Kongish. Taking a different perspective, this paper argues that translanguaging per se may not adequately capture the meaning-making processes of Kongish and the virality of signs in such an online register. Instead of translanguaging, we focus on the enregisterment of Kongish on Kongish Daily , in particular, how it projects ludicity and recalcitrance through the means of entextualization, stance-making, taboo-breaking, and ideologically constructing itself as a named language for Hong Kong people. Combining discourse-centered online ethnography (DCOE) with multimodal critical discourse analysis (MCDA) and participatory linguistics , this paper analyzed 6 posts and related interactions in the comment-section, examining how Kongish is produced, circulated, and increasingly languagized on Kongish Daily through translanguaging practices. In this perspective, the primary function of translanguaging in Kongish is – rather than efficient communication – to obfuscate for the purpose of excluding “outsiders” and fostering shared identity among “insiders”.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ma et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: