This article analyzes Lacan’s concepts of ideal ego and ego-ideal, suggesting an interpretation based on Freud’s critique of Jung.
Jacques Lacan’s Seminar I (1954) draws heavily on the distinction between “ideal ego” and “ego-ideal,” taken from Sigmund Freud’s 1914 work On Narcissism . Lacan identifies these phrases with his own Imaginary and Symbolic registers, which Jacques-Alain Miller understandably places at the center of Seminar I. Against one interpretation of Lacan, this article contends that the Imaginary and the Symbolic cannot generate the Real because they presuppose it. On the basis of Freud’s critique of Jung, a three-level model of our relation to objects is also developed: (1) literal/scientific, (2) aesthetic/performative/militant, and (3) unconscious.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Graham Harman (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: