PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 29, 2026International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health0 citationsOpen Access

Assessing the Influence of Socio-Demographic and Personal Traits (Knowledge, Attitude) on Practices Among Silica-Dust Exposed Mineworkers in the SADC Region

View Full Paper
NKN KhozaDMDingani MoyoPRPhoka C. Rathebe

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of mineworkers towards silica dust exposure in the SADC region.
  • Cross-sectional analytical study involving 1440 mineworkers across Lesotho, Malawi, Mozambique, and Zambia.
  • Data collected using structured questionnaires addressing socio-demographic traits and KAP regarding silica dust.
  • Data analysis conducted using Stata version 18.
  • 91% of participants had adequate knowledge and 88% demonstrated acceptable practices regarding silica dust.
  • 51% of mineworkers reported negative safety attitudes despite high knowledge levels.
  • Compulsory training correlated with a 1.20-unit decrease in practice scores, while external training and higher education linked to improved compliance (+2.98 units).

Abstract

Background: Exposure to respirable crystalline silica dust remains a significant occupational health challenge in the Southern African Development Community region, leading to high incidences of silicosis and pulmonary tuberculosis, particularly among mining workers. This study evaluated the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of mineworkers regarding silica dust risks across Lesotho, Malawi, Mozambique, and Zambia. Methods: A cross-sectional analytical study was conducted involving 1440 mineworkers exposed to silica dust in mines across four SADC countries. Data were collected using structured questionnaires covering socio-demographic traits and knowledge, attitude, and practices. Data analysis was conducted using Stata version 18. Results: While 91% of participants exhibited adequate knowledge and 88% demonstrated acceptable practices, 51% maintained negative safety attitudes. Knowledge scores were positively correlated with company training (r = 0.386). However, a “Training Paradox” emerged in the regression model: compulsory company training was significantly associated with a 1.20-unit decrease in practice scores, whereas external training and higher education levels (+2.98 units) predicted improved compliance. Technicians and younger workers were identified as higher-risk cohorts. Conclusions: The findings suggest that top-down mandatory training may trigger psychological reactance, undermining behavioural safety. To mitigate silica-related diseases, industry stakeholders should transition toward participatory, role-specific safety interventions that prioritize worker autonomy and cognitive engagement over administrative compliance.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Khoza et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a192d2efab5b468c44160fehttps://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph23060710
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper