Compares growth and yield of canola genotypes under varying nitrogen supplies, suggesting nitrate enhances growth.
Context Canola (Brassica napus L.) is an important oil crop that requires high nitrogen rates, but is sensitive to ammonium (NH4+-N) toxicity. Aims To determine whether genotypes exhibit variation in NH4+-N toxicity, and whether NH4+-N toxicity may be ameliorated by mixing nitrate (NO3−-N) and NH4+-N in various ratios, or by providing NH4+-N and NO3−-N in various sequences. Methods Using glasshouse experiments, we tested the growth of two NH4+-N toxicity-sensitive genotypes [SC03-1 (codenamed G30) and Zhongshuang4B (G3)] and two NH4+-N toxicity-resistant genotypes [Tarcoola-22 (G26) and ZY001 (G16)] under five NH4+:NO3− ratios at the 1.5 vegetative stage and three NH4+:NO3− ratios at seed maturity. We then selected the most NH4+-N-resistant (ZY001) and -sensitive (SC03-1) genotypes to grow at alternating nitrogen form supplies until the 1.5 vegetative stage. Key results In general, ZY001 had the highest growth and yield, especially at 50:50 and 25:75 NH4+:NO3− ratios. NH4+-N toxicity was mitigated when NH4+-N supply was combined with relatively high concentrations of NO3−-N. When alternating NH4+-N and NO3−-N supply, canola genotypes consistently performed poorly with NH4+-N supply and improved with NO3−-N. Conclusions Higher concentrations of nitrate relative to NH4+-N, and the use of nitrate alone (either before or after NH4+-N fertilisation), were associated with improved canola growth and physiological parameters under glasshouse conditions. The genotype ZY001 exhibited superior performance among the four genotypes studied. Implications Using nitrate instead of NH4+-N as a nitrogen source may improve canola growth under glasshouse conditions. The ZY001 genotype showed tolerance to NH4+-N toxicity and may be useful for future studies under field conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Al-Awad et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: