Randomized trial compares diagnostic accuracy of micro-ultrasound and MRI in prostate cancer detection, suggesting micro-ultrasound as a viable alternative.
Background Accurate detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) is essential for treatment decisions. MRI-targeted biopsy improves accuracy but is limited by cost, availability, and inter-reader variability. Micro-ultrasound (microUS) is a high-resolution modality enabling real-time detection of suspicious lesions. Objective To compare the diagnostic accuracy of microUS-targeted biopsy plus systematic biopsy (microUS + SB) vs. MRI-targeted biopsy plus systematic biopsy (MRI + SB) using radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens as reference. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 142 patients undergoing perineal microUS-MRI fusion biopsy from January 2021 to July 2023 at Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, followed by RP. Biopsy ISUP grades were compared with RP pathology per patient. CsCaP detection (ISUP ≥ 2) was evaluated with sensitivity, specificity, and AUC. Concordance was assessed using Wilcoxon signed-rank, Pearson Chi-Square, and McNemar-Bowker tests. Results MicroUS + SB was the only modality without significant deviation from RP ISUP grade ( P = 0.065), whereas MRI + SB remained significantly different ( P = 0.012). Sensitivity for csCaP was 73.3% for microUS + SB and 69.5% for MRI + SB, with similar positive predictive values (97.96% vs. 98.91%). AUCs were comparable (0.776 vs. 0.802). ISUP grading accuracy did not differ significantly ( P = 0.127). No significant predictors of upgrading were identified, though a trend was seen for the number of positive microUS-targeted cores ( P = 0.055). Conclusions MicroUS + SB achieves comparable diagnostic accuracy to MRI + SB for csCaP. Its real-time imaging, cost-effectiveness, and accessibility make microUS a promising alternative to MRI. Prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Furlano et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: