PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 29, 2026Agriculture1 citationsOpen Access

Assessment of Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Economic Benefits, and Emergy-Based Sustainability in Ratoon Rice–Duck Coculture in the Jianghan Plain

View Full Paper
YZYong ZhouHubei Engineering UniversityCLChangchun LiJingdezhen UniversityWWWenjian Wang

Key Points

  • The aim is to assess the greenhouse gas emissions, economic benefits, and emergy-based sustainability of ratoon rice–duck coculture compared to traditional monoculture.
  • Three-year field experiment (2022–2024) with three replications in Jianghan Plain, China.
  • Comparison of GHG emissions, economic benefits, and emergy indicators between ratoon rice monoculture and ratoon rice–duck coculture.
  • Statistical analysis conducted with significance level p < 0.05.
  • Ratoon rice–duck coculture reduced CH4 emissions by 25.7–39.5% but increased N2O emissions by 18.7–122.2%.
  • Global warming potential (GWP) and GHG intensity decreased by 27.8% and 30.7%, respectively.
  • Economic benefits increased by 131.0–167.1%, though emergy sustainability indicators like the renewable emergy ratio (%R) and emergy sustainability index (ESI) decreased.

Abstract

Ratoon rice monoculture system (RR) is a labor-efficient and high-yielding cropping system in southern China. The rice–duck coculture system has been increasingly recognized as a mutually beneficial agricultural practice. However, the environmental impacts, economic performance, and sustainability of transitioning from a RR monoculture to a ratoon rice–duck system (RR-D) coculture remain unclear. A three-year (2022–2024) field experiment with three replications was therefore conducted in the Jianghan Plain, China (29°41′ N, 112°25′ E), to compare greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, economic benefits, and emergy-based sustainability indicators between the RR and RR-D systems at a significant level of p < 0.05. The results showed that the RR-D significantly reduced CH4 emissions by 25.7–39.5% but increased N2O emissions by 18.7–122.2%. The average global warming potential (GWP) and GHG intensity decreased by 27.8% and 30.7%, respectively. Meanwhile, RR-D increased economic benefits by 131.0–167.1%, but lowered the unit emergy value per economic benefit (UEVBenefits), renewable emergy ratio (%R), emergy yield ratio (EYR), and emergy sustainability index (ESI), and increased the environmental loading ratio (ELR). Overall, RR-D may improve economic returns and GHG mitigation, but its emergy-based sustainability requires optimization of feed, labor, and duck stocking density.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhou et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a192d7efab5b468c4416526https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture16111172
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper