Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Compares corrosion resistance of Cu–Ni alloys and coatings in simulated seawater, highlighting options for marine applications.
Given the widespread use of cupronickel alloys in the marine industry, despite their higher cost than pure copper, this work explores the application of Ni-B and Ni-P coatings on pure copper as a potential alternative. Ni-6 wt-% B (Ni-B) and Ni-11 wt-% P (Ni-P) coatings were applied to a pure copper substrate using an electroless process. The microstructure and morphology of the coatings were analysed using X-ray diffraction and field emission scanning electron microscopy. The corrosion behaviour of the coatings, along with Cu–10 wt-% Ni (Cu–10Ni), Cu-20 wt-% Ni (Cu–20Ni), and pure copper, was investigated in simulated seawater using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and potentiodynamic polarisation methods. The results showed that the Ni-P coating exhibited the highest corrosion resistance (4.5 × 10 −7 A·cm −2 ), followed by the Ni-B coating (5.5 × 10 −7 A·cm −2 ). The corrosion resistance of Cu–10Ni (1.2 × 10 −6 A·cm −2 ) and Cu–20Ni (1.1 × 10 −6 A·cm −2 ) was superior to that of pure copper (2.5 × 10 −6 A·cm −2 ). The corrosion mechanism of the alloys is influenced by both the charge transfer process and diffusion. Significant higher hardness of the Ni-B (930 ± 10 HV 100 ) and Ni-P (605 ± 5 HV 100 ) coatings compared to the bare alloys suggests improved tribological performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zarebidaki et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: