Prospective cohort study develops a risk score to predict chemotherapy toxicity and hospitalization in older adults, indicating potential treatment modifications.
1659 Background: Older adults receiving chemotherapy are at high risk for severe treatment-related toxicities, which may compromise treatment completion and lead to unplanned hospitalizations. We developed a composite risk score integrating the components of Cancer and Aging Research Group (CARG) chemotherapy toxicity score and proved clinical predictors to enhance prediction of grade 3–5 (G3–5) chemotherapy-related toxicities, treatment tolerance, and unplanned hospitalization. Methods: Patients aged ≥70 years with solid tumors initiating chemotherapy were enrolled between December 2024 and August 2025 at a tertiary hospital in Shanghai, China. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of any G3–5 chemotherapy-related toxicity; secondary endpoints included chemotherapy incompletion and unplanned hospitalization. Baseline characteristics included the CARG score, tumor- and treatment-related characteristics, and laboratory parameters. Toxicities (graded using CTCAE v5.0 ), treatment completion, and unplanned hospitalizations were assessed at each cycle for up to 6 months or until completion of the planned treatment course. Predictors of G3–5 toxicities were screened by LASSO-penalized multivariable logistic regression, and model discrimination was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic curve. Results: Among 242 patients (median age 74 years; range 70–88), 71.9% were male, 64.5% had gastrointestinal malignancies, and 73.1% had stage IV disease. Overall, 164 patients (67.8%) experienced G3–5 toxicities, and 63 (26.0%) had unplanned hospitalizations. The score system included cancer type, hemoglobin, estimated glomerular filtration rate, falls within 6 months, medication management ability, C-reactive protein/albumin, MAX2 index, walking ability, and social activity level. The median score was 10 (range 6–14). Each one-point increase in score was associated with higher risk of any G3–5 toxicity (OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.14–1.30; AUC 0.75) and non-hematologic G3–5 toxicity (OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.12–1.27; AUC 0.73).The score was also positively associated with unplanned hospitalization (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.01–1.13; AUC 0.62), but was inversely associated with chemotherapy incompletion (OR 0.93, p=0.019), suggesting more proactive treatment modifications in high-risk patients. In this cohort, the new score showed superior discrimination for any G3–5 toxicity, with a higher AUC than the CARG score (0.75 vs. 0.63). The optimal cutoff point of any G3–5 toxicity was 7.5 with relatively good specificity (72%) and sensitivity (65%). Conclusions: The composite score may help predict G3–5 toxicity, non-hematologic G3-5 toxicities, and unplanned hospitalization, potentially outperforming the CARG score. External validation and evaluation of clinical utility are warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: