Retrospective review shows increased free flap surgeries with improved outcomes at a tertiary center.
BACKGROUND: Microvascular free flap surgery is a cornerstone of modern reconstructive surgery, providing robust coverage for complex defects. While studies have examined outcomes in specific anatomical sites, few have evaluated long-term institutional trends across all indications. This study aimed to assess temporal changes in microvascular free flap reconstructive surgery at a tertiary plastic surgery unit over 12 years. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of free and locoregional flap reconstructions performed between 2012 and 2023 at a single tertiary centre. Data collected included patient demographics, flap type, anatomical region, surgical indication and complication rates. RESULTS: A total of 912 free flaps and 628 locoregional flaps were performed during the study period. The volume of free flaps increased by 2.6-fold, from 4.7 procedures per month in 2012 to 12.2 in 2023 (p < 0.0001), whereas locoregional flap rates remained stable. Head and neck reconstruction accounted for the majority of cases (58%), followed by lower limb (29%) and breast (6.3%), with breast and lower limb demonstrating the greatest proportional growth. Malignancy was the most frequent indication, although trauma and infection-related reconstructions increased in later years. Takeback rates declined from 25.6% in 2012 to 17.1% in 2023, with flap loss rates consistently below 5%. CONCLUSION: This 12-year review demonstrates a significant rise in free tissue reconstructions without a corresponding decline in locoregional procedures, indicating a genuine growth in microsurgical activity. These findings highlight increasing demand, improved outcomes, and the ongoing need for investment in microsurgical services, training, and infrastructure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yaksich et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: