Randomized trial tests a new CAR T-cell therapy’s effectiveness in targeting B-cell lymphoma, suggesting enhanced treatment options.
INTRODUCTION: Second generation CAR T-cells have transformed the management of B-cell malignancy. However, in vivo functional persistence is often limiting, highlighting a key mechanism of treatment failure. METHODS: We have engineered a parallel (p)CAR platform which delivers dual CD28 and 4-1BB co-stimulation via a co-expressed CAR and chimeric co-stimulatory receptor (CCR). To target CD19, we employed an avidity-optimised FMC63 scFv to direct CAR specificity while utilising an unmodified FMC63 scFv to target the CCR. Here, we describe the late-stage optimisation of this system for Phase 1 clinical evaluation. First, we confirmed that the avidity-optimised scFv lacked off-target specificity. To minimise risk of insertional mutagenesis and immunogenicity respectively, we transitioned from a gammaretrovirus to a third generation lentiviral expression vector and removed epitope tags used to discriminate between CAR and CCR expression. RESULTS: Most strikingly, we found that inactivation of immune tyrosine activation motif 2 and 3 within our pCAR prototype markedly potentiated efficacy in xenograft-bearing NSG mice. Mechanistically, this resulted from increased pCAR T-cell functional persistence and organ infiltration, with enhanced local clearance of malignant B-cells. CONCLUSION: These data set the scene for evaluation of this iteratively honed pCAR candidate in a clinical trial in relapsed/refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kausar et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: