PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 29, 2026Modelling—International Open Access Journal of Modelling in Engineering Science0 citationsOpen Access

Hybrid Mechanistic–Data-Driven Virtual Metering Models and Methodologies for Conventional Gas Fields

View Full Paper
MWMinhao WangZWZhenjia WangGCGangping Chen

Key Points

  • To develop a hybrid virtual flow metering method using mechanistic and data-driven models for gas wells.
  • Constructed four mechanistic models based on choke-flow dynamics using piecewise linear regression.
  • Implemented six machine learning models optimized via grid search and cross-validation.
  • Utilized field data from gas wells in the Southwest Oil and Gas Field for systematic testing.
  • The temperature-difference piecewise linear model showed a training R2 of 0.91 and a mean test error of 4.59%.
  • XGBoost model achieved a training R2 of 0.979 with a mean test error of 0.13%.
  • Key features like 'Date' and 'Valve Position Indication' contributed over 50% to prediction accuracy.

Abstract

Virtual flow metering (VFM) serves as an effective alternative to traditional physical flow meters, significantly reducing gas-field metering costs and operational complexity. However, conventional VFM typically employs a single-modeling approach, failing to address metering requirements across varying production conditions and data types. Focusing on wellhead choke equipment, four mechanistic models (MModels) based on choke-flow dynamics are constructed using piecewise linear regression, alongside six machine learning models. Hyperparameters are optimized via grid search and cross-validation, establishing a hybrid mechanistic and data-driven multi-model VFM method for gas wells. Systematic testing utilizes field data from gas wells in the Southwest Oil and Gas Field, with the Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) method quantifying feature contributions. MModel results indicate superior overall performance by the temperature-difference piecewise linear model, yielding a training R2 of 0.91 and a mean test error of 4.59%. Under different valve-position conditions, the downstream-temperature piecewise linear model demonstrates better predictive capability when the valve position is equal to 100, whereas the valve-position piecewise linear model achieves higher accuracy when the valve position is less than 100. MLModel results reveal that among ten feature parameters, “Date” and “Valve Position Indication” contribute most significantly to prediction accuracy, accounting for over 50% of cumulative contribution in GBoost (extreme gradient boosting) and CatBoost (categorical boosting) models. Notably, the XGBoost model exhibits optimal predictive performance, achieving a training R2 of 0.979 and a mean test error of merely 0.13%. Random sampling results show coefficient of variation values below 0.1 for all metrics, demonstrating exceptional robustness, providing an effective technical solution and solid theoretical support for gas-field VFM.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a192e4efab5b468c44174dahttps://doi.org/10.3390/modelling7030099
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A novel framework for predicting non-stationary production time series of shale gas based on BiLSTM-RF-MPA deep fusion model2024 · 29 citations
  2. 2Data-Driven Production Forecasting of Unconventional Wells with Apache Spark2018 · 11 citations
  3. 3Application and prospects of multi-phase pipeline simulation technology in empowering the intelligent oil and gas fields2023 · 29 citations
  4. 4Uncertainty quantification for virtual diagnostic of particle accelerators2021 · 17 citations
  5. 5The Benefits of Virtual Meter Applications on Production Monitoring and Reservoir Management2019 · 12 citations