Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Investigates meal frequency effects on behaviour in captive otters, suggesting specific behavioural changes occur without altering overall activity.
This study investigated the impact of meal frequency on behavioural patterns of captive Asian small-clawed otters. Six adult otters at Parc d'Isle, Saint-Quentin, France, were observed under three sequential feeding regimens: three, four and five meals per day over 30 days total. Behavioural data collected via scan sampling showed that frequency of grooming behaviours significantly increased with higher meal frequencies (χ² = 12.4, p < 0.01). Locomotion, eating, foraging and inactive (resting) behaviour frequencies remained statistically unchanged across feeding regimens (p > 0.05). The frequency of aggressive behaviours decreased with increased meal frequency (χ² = 6.2, p < 0.05), although they were rare at baseline. Drinking behaviour frequency decreased significantly as meal frequency increased (χ² = 15.3, p < 0.001). Scanning and unclassified behaviour frequencies differed significantly across feeding regimens (p < 0.01 and p < 0.001, respectively). Food consumption remained consistently high (96.25%-98.07%) across all feeding regimens with no significant differences (p > 0.05). Daily meal duration was unaffected by feeding frequency. These results demonstrate that meal frequency alterations produce specific behavioural changes in captive Asian small-clawed otters without affecting food consumption or overall activity levels.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bensalem et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: