Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Empirical study reveals recursive generative stability is influenced by calibration direction and epistemic filtering.
This paper presents an empirical study of the OEA (Ontology, Epistemic, Agentic) framework as a three-layer protocol for improving reliability in recursive generative systems under synthetic-data exposure. The central thesis is: recursive generative stability depends more strongly on calibration direction and epistemic filtering than on unconstrained retrieval augmentation. The study reports four experiments: (1) a bigram-proxy ablation study across 12 variants, (2) a four-model real LLM validation on distilgpt2 (82M), gpt2 (124M), gpt-neo-125M (125M), and Qwen2.5-1.5B (1.5B) with corpus-grounded token-overlap retrieval, (3) a 30-step recursive memory drift benchmark, and (4) a baseline competition against temperature reduction, top-k, entropy filtering, and repetition penalty. Full OEA achieves TRR = 0.836, FRR = 0.081 (d = 4.56, p < 0.001). Results are fully reproducible with fixed seeds; all artifacts are on GitHub.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tristen Pierson (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: