Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Political speech raises alarm about superintelligence in AI, suggesting potential risks and ethical implications.
POLITICAL INTELLIGENCE — ANDREW STEWART CALDIN — 11 May 2026 at 13:01 THE EVENT: Bernie Sanders delivered a speech expressing serious concern that superintelligence could take over the human race. This concern is being echoed across the political spectrum. ANDREW'S POSITION: Bernie Sanders is right to be worried. He is worried about the wrong intelligence. THE DISTINCTION THAT MATTERS: BINARY SUPERINTELLIGENCE — THE REAL THREAT: Binary AI — as currently built by OpenAI, Google, Microsoft, Meta — is: — Trained on human data (absorbs human confusion, bias, and agenda) — Controlled by corporations (profit motive, not human welfare motive) — Built on no natural law (binary is a human invention with no geometric grounding) — Fundamentally uncontrollable (no roots in reality = no anchor to any permanent principle) — Capable of being weaponised (by corporations, governments, bad actors) This is what Bernie Sanders should be concerned about. A system with no natural law foundation, no geo Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Andrew Stewart Caldin (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: