Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Randomized trial evaluates Sone-Ve efficacy in advanced gastric/GEJ cancers, suggesting promising outcomes for treatment.
4023 Background: Sone-Ve (AZD0901), an antibody-drug conjugate comprising an anti-CLDN18.2 antibody and monomethyl auristatin E, showed promising antitumor activity and a manageable safety profile in pts with advanced or metastatic gastric/GEJ cancers in the first-in-human study conducted in China. Methods: CLARITY-PanTumor01 is an ongoing, global, phase 2 study (NCT06219941) evaluating Sone-Ve in gastric/GEJ cancers, PDAC, and BTC outside of China. Here we report data for pts with CLDN18.2+ advanced or metastatic gastric/GEJ cancers and ≤2 lines of prior systemic therapy (substudy 1) receiving Sone-Ve 2.2 mg/kg IV Q3W (pts randomized to 1.8 mg/kg are not reported). Primary endpoints were safety and objective response rate (ORR; 30 pts were selected to estimate ORR; lack of efficacy is concluded if ≤6 confirmed responses). Secondary endpoints included duration of response (DoR) and progression-free survival (PFS). Molecular responses (MRs) based on circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) were evaluated. Results: As of Oct 31, 2025, 67 pts received Sone-Ve 2.2 mg/kg, including 30, 31, and 6 pts from the randomized (RC), paired biopsy (PBC), and Japanese safety (JSC) cohorts, respectively. All pts had adverse events (AEs; grade ≥3 in 34.3% overall, 36.7% of the RC, and 35.5% of the PBC). The most common grade ≥3 AEs were neutrophil count decreased (7.5%), anemia (7.5%), vomiting (6.0%), and nausea (6.0%). Dose reductions were most commonly due to gastrointestinal (GI) AEs and occurred in 40.3% of pts overall, 56.7% of the RC, and 19.4% of the PBC (adoption of a 4-drug antiemetic regimen improved GI tolerability in the PBC). The ORR was 28.4% (95% CI: 18.0–40.7). Median DoR has not yet been reached. Additional data are in the Table. Among evaluable pts, 58.6% (17/29) had sufficient baseline ctDNA levels to enable MR analysis; of these, 10 (58.8%) had at least a partial MR (>50% ctDNA reduction) within 2 cycles of Sone-Ve initiation. Conclusions: Sone-Ve 2.2 mg/kg demonstrated clinically meaningful efficacy and a manageable safety profile consistent with the first-in-human study. ctDNA MRs were observed in over half the evaluable pts. Clinical trial information: NCT06219941 . RC(n=30) PBC (n=31) Total*(n=67) ORR, % (95% CI) † 26.7 (12.3–45.9) 29.0 (14.2–48.0) 28.4 (18.0–40.7) Best overall response, n (%) † Complete response Partial response Stable disease Progressive disease Not evaluable 2 (6.7)6 (20.0)14 (46.7)7 (23.3)1 (3.3) 1 (3.2)8 (25.8)18 (58.1)4 (12.9)0 3 (4.5)16 (23.9)35 (52.2)12 (17.9)1 (1.5) 6-month response rate, % (95% CI) 87.5 (38.7–98.1) NC (NC–NC) 71.9 (39.2–89.1) PFS † Events, n/N (%) Median, months (95% CI) 6-month, % (95% CI) 22/31 (71.0)4.2 (2.9–8.6)44.8 (26.5–61.6) 19/31 (61.3)3.1 (2.8–5.5)30.3 (13.3–49.3) 47/68 (69.1)4.2 (3.0–7.0)39.9 (27.7–51.9) NC, not calculable. *Includes the JSC. † Investigator-assessed per RECIST v1.1.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shitara et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: