Compares diving and foraging behaviors in northern bottlenose whales, indicating ecological implications.
Geographic variation in the diving behaviour of oceanic mammals is a major component of their biodiversity with far‐reaching relevance for ecology and conservation. Here we compared high‐resolution multi‐sensor tag data from northern bottlenose whales in Jan Mayen, Norway ( n = 15, 127.2 h) and the Gully, Scotian Shelf, Canada ( n = 6, 45.8 h) to compare diving and foraging behaviours. K ‐means clustering identified short‐shallow and long‐deep dive types in both locations but showed a propensity for mid‐depth dives in Jan Mayen. Foraging dives (defined by high roll variance corroborated by active clicking) included long‐deep dives (Jan Mayen = 967 ± 394 m SD, n = 26; Gully = 1247 ± 411 m, n = 14) but also these mid‐depth dives (537 ± 135 m, n = 105). Time budgets varied substantially between locations with whales in the Gully spending 15% less time foraging ( Z = 2.1, p = 0.03) and twice as much time near‐surface resting ( Z = −3.8, p < 0.001). Movement parameters further showed enigmatic gyrations during dives, more common in Jan Mayen. Skin biopsy stable isotopes revealed small regional differences, likely reflecting both diet and ecoregion (Jan Mayen n = 18: δ 15 N 15.03‰ ± 0.35‰, Gully n = 41: δ 15 N 15.41‰ ± 0.44‰). These population differences suggest unequal susceptibility to stressors and unequal likelihood of detection, with consequences for population management and abundance estimation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hooker et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: