Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Randomized trial examines radiation use and outcomes in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer, suggesting further adoption of effective techniques.
5523 Background: Brachytherapy with concurrent chemoradiation +/- pembrolizumab is the current standard of care for LACC. American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) recommends external beam radiation therapy (EBRT)+brachytherapy, and since 2020 has recommended intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) over other forms of EBRT due to reduced toxicity risk. However, real-world evidence is needed to characterize patient outcomes based on the type of radiation received. Methods: Electronic medical record (EMR) data from The US Oncology Network identified adult LACC (FIGO 2018 Stage IB3-IVA) patients (pts) diagnosed between July 2018 – July 2022 and followed through June 2024. Pts were stratified by receipt of IMRT or Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) and brachytherapy during the observation period. Patient characteristics and provider-documented progression were assessed descriptively. Results: This study included 250 LACC pts; 73 (29%) pts received IMRT or VMAT, 177 (71%) pts received other forms of EBRT; and 189 (76%) pts received brachytherapy. Overall, 61 pts (24%) received both IMRT or VMAT and brachytherapy. Among the 148 pts who were diagnosed in 2020 or later, 28% received IMRT or VMAT. Disease progression occurred among 14% of IMRT or VMAT pts and 63% of non IMRT or VMAT patients; progression was similar across brachytherapy and non-brachytherapy patients. Conclusions: Advanced radiation techniques such as IMRT or VMAT and brachytherapy are associated with improved outcomes for patients with LACC, yet their combined use only occurs among 1 in 4 LACC patients, which is notably less than clinical trials. These findings present an opportunity to broaden adoption of evidence-based radiation strategies, supporting optimal treatment delivery and improved patient outcomes. IMRT or VMAT non IMRT or VMAT Brachytherapy Non-brachytherapy Patient, N 73 177 189 61 Age (yrs, median) 51 54 51 59 Race (White), N(%) 50 (69) 101 (57) 114 (60) 37 (60) Race (non-White), N(%) 9 (12) 36 (20) 35 (19) 10 (16) Race (not documented), N(%) 14 (19) 40 (23) 40 (21) 14 (23)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Szamreta et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: