Retrospective cohort study demonstrates favorable survival and local control in cervical cancer treated with CT-based adaptive brachytherapy, highlighting key dose and timing targets.
Background/Objectives: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based image-guided adaptive brachytherapy (IGABT) is the preferred standard for cervical cancer, but access remains limited in many settings. Computed tomography (CT)-based IGABT provides a practical alternative. We evaluated clinical outcomes and prognostic factors following its routine implementation. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2018 stage I–IVA cervical carcinoma treated with definitive radiotherapy incorporating CT-based IGABT from January 2019 to December 2021. Patients received pelvic external beam radiotherapy (45–50.4 Gy in 23–28 fractions), with or without concurrent platinum-based chemotherapy, followed by four high-dose-rate brachytherapy fractions. Local control and overall survival were estimated using Kaplan–Meier analysis, and prognostic factors were evaluated using Cox regression. Results: Among 237 patients, 56.9% had FIGO stage III–IV disease, and hybrid intracavitary/interstitial brachytherapy was used in 30.2% of fractions. The mean high-risk clinical target volume D90 (HR-CTV D90) was 85.4 ± 2.7 Gy EQD2. Median follow-up was 59.9 months for local control and 71.1 months for overall survival. The 5-year local control and overall survival rates were 84.4% (95% CI, 79.1–88.5%) and 62.9% (95% CI, 56.3–68.8%), respectively. Squamous histology was independently associated with improved local control and overall survival. HR-CTV D90 ≥ 85 Gy EQD2 was associated with improved local control, whereas ≥4 chemotherapy cycles and overall treatment time ≤ 56 days were associated with improved overall survival. Conclusions: Routine CT-based IGABT achieved clinically meaningful outcomes despite the high proportion of advanced-stage disease. Achieving HR-CTV D90 ≥ 85 Gy EQD2, delivering ≥4 chemotherapy cycles, and completing treatment within 56 days were associated with improved outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Muangwong et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: