Investigates short static imaging protocols for neuroinflammation detection in autoimmune encephalitis and multiple system atrophy, suggesting clinical robustness.
Introduction [ 18 F]fluorodeprenyl-D2 ([ 18 F]F-DED) positron emission tomography (PET) imaging detects reactive astrogliosis in patients with autoimmune encephalitis (AIE) and multiple system atrophy (MSA). Although dynamic 60-min acquisitions are established, shorter static imaging protocols are desirable for severely impaired patients. This study investigated the feasibility of short static time windows for [ 18 F]F-DED PET imaging in AIE and MSA. Methods Dynamic 60-min [ 18 F]F-DED PET scans were analyzed in 20 patients with AIE, 20 patients with MSA (MSA-P/MSA-C), and 16 controls (CTRL). Disease-related lesions were manually segmented based on visually detectable positive PET-signal in AIE and MSA predilection sites (i.e. mesial temporal lobe, posterior putamen, cerebellar deep white matter), and standardized uptake value ratios (SUVr; cerebellar cortex as a reference tissue) were calculated for consecutive 10-min intervals. Advanced kinetic parameters (DVR, VTr) were derived using Logan plot and a one-tissue compartment model (1TC2k) with image-derived input functions, both applying the cerebellar cortex as a reference tissue. Results Static images acquired between 10 and 60 min p.i. showed good image contrast and signal-to-noise ratio. SUVr of lesions increased over time and approached a plateau at approximately 50–60 min p.i.. The strongest agreement between SUVr and DVR was observed between 30 and 50 min p.i.. Late-phase SUVr outperformed kinetic parameters in discriminating lesions from healthy tissue in both AIE and MSA. Conclusion Short static [ 18 F⁸ ]F-DED PET acquisitions are clinically robust for detecting neuroinflammation in AIE and MSA. A late static acquisition between 30–50 min p.i. provides the optimal balance between accuracy and scanning efficiency.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tagnin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: