Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Why does the mammalian vascular tree maintain a conserved branching exponent α^* ≈ 2.72 across a 10⁷-fold range in body mass, despite a fundamental shift from viscous to wave-dominated transport? We prove this universality cannot emerge from local optimization: any junction-level coupling of incommensurable costs requires scale-dependent fine-tuning varying by O(10²--10³) across the hierarchy. Real networks resolve this through structural heterogeneity, and vascular geometry emerges as a scale-free attractor of a network-level minimax principle. Grounding the fitness penalty in ATP stoichiometry, we prove a Topological Rigidity theorem: the optimal branching exponent depends only on dimensionless structural parameters (G, N, p, αw), independent of all metabolic quantities. A self-consistency condition on the viscous--inertial energy partition yields a dual-threshold framework with Wocᶠˡᵘⁱᵈ = √3 and Wocʷᵃᵛᵉ = 3/√2. The symmetric model yields α^*model ≈ 2.626, in agreement with mammals near the allometric transition; morphometric heterogeneities shift large-mammal values toward $2.72$. The framework explains developmental stability of cardiovascular networks as a consequence of architecture being decoupled from biochemistry.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Riccardo Marchesi (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: