Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A classroom teacher asked two colleagues in his district to keep a daily record of their aims, methods, materials, and great discussions in two courses each: one state-tested, the other an untested elective course with no state curriculum. Each week during the study, the teacher reviewed these logs with his colleagues in separate interviews. Data analysis revealed a complete split between the courses : ambitious history teaching activities in the electives, and rote-learning emphasizing coverage and facts in the state-tested courses, demonstrating a dramatic impact of state testing on daily teaching comparable to results of tracking studies, and contrary to prior research on testing in social studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gerwin et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: