Key result
Following lower extremity endovascular interventions, 57.69% of patients were discharged on DAPT, with 56.49% and 49.63% of those patients remaining on DAPT at 9-12 and 21-24 months, respectively.
Why the study?
Data regarding the regimen and duration of antiplatelet therapy following lower extremity endovascular interventions remain limited.
Observational (n=23,420)
Yes
Slightly more than half of patients undergoing lower extremity endovascular interventions are discharged on DAPT, and adherence drops to under 50% by 2 years, highlighting significant practice variability and a need for further studies to define optimal duration.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Variable DAPT use after lower extremity endovascular intervention highlights practice heterogeneity; leaves open optimal duration and adherence targets for trials.
Antiplatelet therapy is commonly prescribed following endovascular interventions. However, there is limited data regarding the regimen and duration of antiplatelet therapy following lower extremity endovascular interventions. The aim of this study was to investigate the practice patterns of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after lower extremity endovascular interventions. We identified all patients who received an endovascular intervention in the Vascular Study Group of New England (VSGNE) registry from 2010 through 2018. The antiplatelet regimen was examined at the time of discharge and follow-up. Variables predicting discharge antiplatelet therapy and duration of antiplatelet therapy were investigated. There were 13,510 (57.69%) patients discharged on DAPT, 8618 (36.80%) patients discharged on single antiplatelet therapy, and 1292 (5.51%) patients discharged without antiplatelet therapy. Patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), prior vascular bypass and endovascular intervention, preoperative statin use, stent placement compared with angioplasty, and femoropopliteal and tibial treatment were associated with higher odds of being discharged with DAPT compared with no antiplatelet therapy and single antiplatelet therapy. Of the patients discharged on DAPT who were followed up at 9-12 months and 21-24 months, 56.49% and 49.63% remained on DAPT, respectively. Only a narrow margin of the patient majority undergoing endovascular interventions was discharged with DAPT, suggesting that only a small proportion of patients undergoing endovascular intervention remain on DAPT long-term. As the number of peripheral vascular interventions continues to grow, further studies are crucial to identify the optimal duration of DAPT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Lower extremity endovascular interventions (n=23,420). Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) vs. Single antiplatelet therapy or no antiplatelet therapy was evaluated on Discharge on dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). Following lower extremity endovascular interventions, 57.69% of patients were discharged on DAPT, with 56.49% and 49.63% of those patients remaining on DAPT at 9-12 and 21-24 months, respectively.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: