Why the study?
The appropriate duration of DAPT and the risk-benefit ratio of long-term DAPT in patients with left main disease undergoing PCI remain uncertain.
Does long-term dual antiplatelet therapy (>12 months) reduce the composite of death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, or stroke in patients after stenting for left main coronary artery disease who are event-free at 12 months?
Does long-term dual antiplatelet therapy (>12 months) reduce the composite of death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, or stroke in patients after stenting for left main coronary artery disease who are event-free at 12 months?
In patients event-free at 1 year after left main stenting, continuing dual antiplatelet therapy beyond 12 months significantly reduced ischemic events without increasing clinically relevant bleeding.
Do not yet prolong DAPT beyond 12 months after uneventful LM PCI; leaves open RCT confirmation before practice change.
Background: The appropriate duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) and risk-benefit ratio for long-term DAPT in patients with left main (LM) disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention remains uncertain. Methods: Four thousand five hundred sixty-one consecutive patients with stenting of LM disease at a single center from January 2004 to December 2016 were enrolled. Decision to discontinue or remain on DAPT after 12 months was left to an individualized decision-making based on treating physicians by weighing the patient’s risks of ischemia versus bleeding and considering patient preference. The primary outcome was a composite of death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, or stroke at 3 years. Key safety outcome was 3-year rate of Bleeding Academic Research Consortium 2, 3, or 5 bleeding. Results: Of 3865 patients free of ischemic and bleeding events at 12 months, 1727 (44.7%) remained on DAPT (mostly clopidogrel based [97.7%]) beyond 12 months after LM percutaneous coronary intervention. DAPT>12-month versus ≤12-month DAPT was associated with a significant reduced risk of 3-year primary outcome (2.6% versus 4.6%; adjusted hazard ratio: 0.59 [95% CI, 0.41–0.84]). The same trend was found for other ischemic end points: death (0.9% versus 3.0%; P log-rank <0.001), cardiovascular death (0.5% versus 1.7%; P log-rank =0.001), myocardial infarction (0.8% versus 1.9%; P log-rank =0.005), and stent thrombosis (0.4% versus 1.1%; P log-rank =0.017). The key safety end point was not significantly different between 2 regimens (1.8% versus 1.6%; adjusted hazard ratio: 1.07 [95% CI, 0.65–1.74]). The effect of DAPT>12 month on primary and key safety outcomes was consistent across clinical presentations, high bleeding risk, P2Y 12 inhibitor, and LM bifurcation percutaneous coronary intervention approach. Conclusions: In a large cohort of patients free from clinical events during the first year after LM percutaneous coronary intervention and at low apparent future bleeding risk, an individualized patient-tailored approach to longer duration (>12 month) of DAPT with aspirin plus a P2Y 12 inhibitor (mostly clopidogrel) improved both composite and individual efficacy outcomes by reducing ischemic risk, without a concomitant increase in clinically relevant bleeding.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: