Key result
Inter-ankle systolic BP difference ≥10 mmHg linked to ~31% higher heart failure risk and increased stroke.
Why the study?
Large inter-ankle systolic blood pressure differences are linked to cardiovascular events and mortality, but the association of longitudinal changes in these differences with outcomes was unknown.
Do increasing or persistently large inter-ankle systolic blood pressure differences increase the risk of cardiovascular events and mortality in older adults?
Cohort (n=2,051)
Do increasing or persistently large inter-ankle systolic blood pressure differences increase the risk of cardiovascular events and mortality in older adults?
Effect estimate: HR 1.31 (95% CI 1.00-1.76)
Increasing or persistently large inter-ankle systolic blood pressure differences are associated with an elevated risk of incident cardiovascular events, suggesting its utility as a risk marker.
BACKGROUND: Large inter-ankle systolic blood pressure (IASBP) differences (≥10 or ≥15 mmHg) have been linked to cardiovascular events and mortality. This longitudinal study evaluated the association of changes in IASBP differences with incident cardiovascular events and mortality. METHODS: In the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study, bilateral ankle blood pressure was measured at Visit 5 and at Visit 6/7 (n = 2051; mean age 73.7 ± 4.3 years). Participants were categorized into four groups by IASBP differences: small at both visits (<10 mmHg); decreasing (≥10 mmHg at Visit 5 but <10 mmHg in Visit 6/7); increasing (<10 mmHg at Visit 5 but ≥10 mmHg in Visit 6/7); and large at both visits (≥10 mmHg). Categories were repeated using a ≥15 mmHg cutoff value. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs). RESULTS: In adjusted analyses, individuals with increasing differences (≥10 mmHg) had higher risks of heart failure (HR: 1.31; 95% confidence intervals [CI], 1.00-1.76) and stroke (HR: 1.57; 95% CI, 1.16-2.11), compared to those with small differences at both visits. Similarly, those with persistently large differences showed elevated risks of coronary heart disease (HR: 2.25; 95% CI, 1.46-3.47) and stroke (HR: 1.68; 95% CI, 1.17-2.41). Analyses using a ≥15 mmHg cutoff value demonstrated even stronger associations with all three cardiovascular events. No significant associations were observed with all-cause or cardiovascular mortality for these categories. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing and persistently large IASBP differences are associated with elevated risk of incident cardiovascular events. Monitoring IASBP differences may help identify individuals at higher risk for adverse outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Charry et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Cardiovascular events (n=2,051). Increasing inter-ankle systolic blood pressure differences (≥10 mmHg) vs. Small inter-ankle systolic blood pressure differences (<10 mmHg) was evaluated on incident heart failure (HR 1.31, 95% CI 1.00-1.76). Increasing inter-ankle systolic blood pressure differences (≥10 mmHg) were associated with higher risks of heart failure (HR 1.31; 95% CI 1.00-1.76) and stroke (HR 1.57; 95% CI 1.16-2.11).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: